British Royalty, Facebook, Misinformation, Nobility, Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom, Twitter
From the Emperor’s Desk:
Im taking several days off and will be back on Tuesday, September 27. The passing of HM Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom has been a huge emotional rollercoaster for me. Ive been doing a lot of writing on various subjects related to the Queen and the British Monarchy in general. In the days after the death of the Queen I was very active on my Twitter Account that was connected to this blog and related Facebook page.
It was extremely stressful! The amount of misinformation is staggering! Not only that there are many people that refused to listen to the accurate information. I posted several times my article “The Princess of Wales is not Princess Catherine”. One person on Twitter said “You can post as many articles on the proper usage of titles all you want, but since the press called Diana, Princess Diana I am going to give Catherine that same honor and call her Princess Catherine”. Another person, a few actually, call the Duchess of Sussex “Princess Meghan” or Queen Meghan. This is what I am up against.
On my Facebook page that is connected to this blog I made a post on how the then Duke of Cambridge was also now the Duke of Cornwall. In that post I mentioned that the Duke of Cambridge and Cornwall was now “the heir to the throne “.
Some follower of the page viscously attacked me for saying that Prince William was now heir to the throne. He said that William has always been the heir to the throne since birth! I mentioned that Prince William had been second in line to the throne since birth but was now first in line to the throne.
The follower said I was wrong and that there was no excuse for my mistake and that the knowledge was not secretive and that my mistake showed my ignorance about royalty and that I am an insult to the Royal Family and my followers.
It’s very strange and ironic. In any topic of study or occupation being accurate is a necessity. My job as an historian is to be accurate. However, with Royalty people have an issue with historians being accurate.
What I will do concerning issues of historical accuracy, such as the proper usage of titles, is to write about it here on my blog and role model proper usage of titles and other information.
Also on Twitter my news feed was flooded with hatred toward the Duchess of Sussex. I try and stay out of the drama. First of all there is a lot of gossip and misinformation on this topic and since it is a semi private matter there is much that goes on behind closed doors that we don’t know about. For me not enough to choose sides and form an opinion. As an historian I try to remain neutral and will observe as it plays out.
But one thing does bother me is the vitriol and the massive amount of hatred that boils down in nothing but extreme cyber bullying. I don’t want to be involved in that and I cannot fix it.
But you know what? I don’t care anymore. I will no longer correct misinformation concerning royalty on social media. It’s a toxic environment. Yesterday someone, referring to the Imperial State Crown, said it was made in the year 1400. No it was not. The frame of the Imperial State Crown was built in 1937 for the Coronation of King George VI. The jewels used in the crown are of various ages, some older than 1400.
A couple of people refered to the late Queen as HRH Queen Elizabeth instead of Her Majesty but I just kept moving along.
Prior to being on the internet and starting this blog and related Facebook page in 2012 I used to do all of this on my own, privately for my own enjoyment, since 1977. I did go to college and got advanced degrees in European History where I focused on European Royalty, but I miss those days of just enjoying this subject on my own.
I have toyed around with shutting down my European Royal History Facebook page but as long as there are no longer personal attacks I will keep it open. Personal attacks on this blog are very rare and I don’t want to close it down because I also want to keep open the access to all the articles I wrote.
Thanks for reading my rant.
Before the Queen passed away I was in the midst of a series of articles on the various pretenders to the French Throne. But I have more things I want to write on the British Monarchy before I get back to that subject.
Some of the subjects I will write about starting next Tuesday are:
1. A series on the British titles of Royalty and Nobility, thier history and proper usage
2. I will write a blog post on my thoughts on the passing of the Queen
3. My support for the principle of Constitutional Monarchy
On Twitter I ran into some anti-monarchists views and calls for the monarchy to be abolished…mostly by Americans…so I want to address those issues.
Thanks for reading and I’ll see you next week!
Ed and Diane Ewing said:
Thank you for your rant. The frustration can be overwhelming! Take time, and a few deep breaths. Continue to do what you know to be right, and develop a very thick skin to protect yourself. You will never overcome the never ending stupidity! I have my own times dealing with TV presenters who continually referred to the “Queen of England”. I never let it pass though and pounced with all the vigour I can muster! I will look forward to your future submissions with much pleasure!!!! Ed
Lola Blanche said:
Dear Liam please ignore the trolls and bullies. Keep up your good work of keeping us informed and educated. I, for one, appreciate your time and effort!
Yes, the frustration can be overwhelming! One of my early blog posts was concerning people calling the Queen the “Queen of England” and now I’m seeing the same about Charles. I think I’ll update that blog post too! Thanks for your support I greatly appreciate it!
Elouise M Payne said:
Enjoy your time off. I love your blog and always look forward to the next post. Thank you so much for all you do; I appreciate it so very much.
Andy Pollock, CD, UE said:
I agree that “the haters will always hate” and “you can’t fix stupid.” I would miss this site very much if you were to stop writing it. I find it very educational and the in-depth research is unequalled by any other site- be it private, or on social media. PLEASE keep writing.
GOD SAVE THE KING!
Jane VW said:
Thank you for maintaining this highly informative and enjoyable “read”. Protocol/correct usage is not only correct/”good” convention but is a legality for identification,(as I understand it), in such matters. Thanks for adding to my knowledge and no complaints from me,
Thanks for your support I do really appreciate it!
kathy Jarman said:
Please do not stop your blog. I enjoy it very immensely. Thank you.